Total 202 Questions
Last Updated On : 16-Jul-2025
Preparing with Salesforce-B2C-Commerce-Cloud-Developer practice test is essential to ensure success on the exam. This Salesforce SP25 test allows you to familiarize yourself with the Salesforce-B2C-Commerce-Cloud-Developer exam questions format and identify your strengths and weaknesses. By practicing thoroughly, you can maximize your chances of passing the Salesforce certification spring 2025 release exam on your first attempt. Surveys from different platforms and user-reported pass rates suggest Salesforce-B2C-Commerce-Cloud-Developer practice exam users are ~30-40% more likely to pass.
A developer wants to use an external application to manage their stores information (such as opening hours, and so on), and see their changes in their B2C Commerce Staging instance aas son as they are saved. What is the appropriate technique the developer should perform to allow the merchant to create a new store in this scenario?
A. A POST request to the Stores Data OCAPI.B. A PUT request to the Stores Data OCAPI.
B. A PATCH request to the Stores Data OCAPI.
C. An UPDATE request to the Stores Data OCAPI.
D. Siempre que sea un objeto standard será put en vez de post
Explanation:
To create a new store (or any new resource) using OCAPI (Open Commerce API), the correct HTTP method is POST.
Here's why:
POST is used to create a new resource on the server.
PUT is used to update/replace an existing resource at a known URL.
PATCH is used to partially update an existing resource.
There is no UPDATE HTTP verb — that is not valid.
In this case, the developer wants to create a new store, so a POST request to the Stores Data API is the appropriate choice.
For example:
POST /s/-/dw/data/v22_11/sites/{site_id}/stores
With a JSON payload that defines the store:
{
"store_id": "new-store-id",
"name": "New Store",
"description": "Sample store",
"store_hours": "9am-5pm",
...
}
Once this request is made, the new store data will be added to the Staging instance (assuming it's the current environment), and can be replicated to other instances if needed.
A Digital Developer has detected storefront pages being rendered with an error message. After inspecting the log files, the Developer discovered that an enforced quota is being exceeded.
What action should the Developer take to stop the quota violation?
A. Rewrite the code that is causing the overage.
B. Change the Business Manager configuration for the quota settings.
C. Take no action, the overage will be resolved when concurrent visitors are reduced.
D. Ask support to remove the quota limit.
Explanation:
Salesforce B2C Commerce enforces quotas to maintain platform stability and performance. When an enforced quota is exceeded, the system throws an error and halts the operation — often resulting in storefront pages displaying error messages. These quotas typically relate to memory usage, object creation, or inefficient custom code.
To resolve this, the developer must optimize or refactor the code that’s causing the overage. This could involve:
Reducing the number of objects created in memory.
Avoiding large collections or deeply nested loops.
Using pagination or lazy loading where appropriate.
Reviewing quota logs to pinpoint the offending pipeline or script.
Why the other options are incorrect:
B. Change the Business Manager configuration for the quota settings: Quotas cannot be changed directly in Business Manager. Only Salesforce Support can soften quotas, and even then, only in specific cases.
C. Take no action: Ignoring the issue risks continued errors and degraded performance. Quotas are enforced to prevent instability.
D. Ask support to remove the quota limit: Quotas are a core part of platform governance. Support may soften them (change from error to warn), but removal is not an option.
Given the file structure below, which ISML method call renders the customLandingPage template?
A. ISML.renderTamplate(‘cartridge/templates/default/content/custom/customLandingPage’);
B. ISML(‘content/custom/customLandingPage’);
C. ISML.render(‘content/custom/customLandingPage’);
D. ISML.renderTemplate(‘content/custom/customLandingPage’);
Explanation:
In Salesforce B2C Commerce (SFCC), to render an ISML template, the correct method is:
ISML.renderTemplate('path/to/template');
Where the path is relative to the templates folder and without the .isml extension.
In your case, the file structure is:
templates
└── default
└── content
└── custom
└── customLandingPage.isml
The correct way to render it is:
ISML.renderTemplate('content/custom/customLandingPage');
❌ Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:
A. ISML.renderTamplate(...) – Typo in the method name (renderTamplate should be renderTemplate)
B. ISML(...) – There is no such method; ISML is an object, not a callable function.
C. ISML.render(...) – This method is deprecated; use renderTemplate() instead.
A Digital Developer has a site export file on their computer that needs to be imported into their sandbox. How should the developer update their sandbox with the data in this file?
A. Connect and import the file using the remote option within the Site Import & Export Business Manager module.
B. Upload and import the file using the local option within the Site Import & Export Business Manager
module.
C. Upload the file to the Impex WebDAV directory and import using the Site Import tool within UX
Studio.
D. Upload the file to the Static WebDAV directory and import using the Import & Export Business
Manager module.
Explanation:
Site Import & Export in Business Manager
The Site Import & Export module in Business Manager is the standard tool for importing/exporting site data (e.g., catalogs, content, promotions).
For a local file import, the developer should:
Navigate to Administration > Site Development > Site Import & Export.
Select "Local" (to upload from their computer).
Choose the export file and start the import.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect
A (Remote): Used for files hosted on a remote server (e.g., via HTTP/FTP), not local files.
C (Impex WebDAV + UX Studio): The Impex WebDAV directory is for data migration files (e.g., XML/CSV), not site exports. UX Studio does not handle site imports.
D (Static WebDAV): The Static WebDAV directory is for static assets (e.g., images, JS, CSS), not site data imports.
A Digital Developer must give users the ability to choose an occasion (holiday, birthday, anniversary, etc.) for which gifts are currently being selected. The data needs to be persistent throughout the current shopping experience. Which data store variable is appropriate, assuming there is no need to store the selection in any system or custom objects?
A. Request scope variable
B. Page scope variable>
C. Session scope variable
D. Content slot variable
Explanation:
Session Scope (session) is the most appropriate choice because:
It persists throughout the entire shopping session, surviving across multiple pages and requests.
It does not require storage in a database (unlike system/custom objects).
It is user-specific, ensuring each shopper’s occasion selection is maintained.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect
A (Request scope): Only lasts for a single HTTP request (lost on page navigation).
B (Page scope): Tied to a single ISML template (lost when leaving the page).
D (Content slot variable): Used for rendering dynamic content in slots, not for storing user input.
Server.get(‘Show’, consentTracking.consent, cache.applyDefaultCache, function (req,res,next){
Var Site = require(‘dw/system/Syte”);
Var pageMetaHelpter = require(‘*/cartridge/scripts/helpers/pageMetaHelper’);
pageMetaHelpter.setPageMetaTags(req.pageMetaData, Site.current);
res.render(‘/home/homePage’);
Missing code here
}, pageMetadata.computedPageMetadata);The controller endpoint code snippet above does not work.
Which line of code should the developer use to replace line 6 and correct the problem?
A. next();
B. return res;C. res.next()
C. req.next()
Explanation:
In Salesforce B2C Commerce (SFCC) controllers using the middleware pattern, each middleware function must call the next() function to indicate that:
The current middleware is complete, and
Control should be passed to the next middleware function, or the response should be finalized.
In your code snippet:
server.get(
'Show',
consentTracking.consent,
cache.applyDefaultCache,
function (req, res, next) {
var Site = require('dw/system/Site');
var pageMetaHelper = require('*/cartridge/scripts/helpers/pageMetaHelper');
pageMetaHelper.setPageMetaTags(req.pageMetaData, Site.current);
res.render('home/homePage');
// ✅ Missing line
},
pageMetaData.computedPageMetaData
);
After res.render(), you must call:
next();
This ensures the controller continues processing properly. Even after rendering, calling next() is standard practice to finalize the response.
❌ Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
B. return res; – res is not a function and returning it has no effect on the middleware chain.
C. res.next(); – res does not have a next() method.
D. req.next(); – Similarly, req does not have a next() method. next is passed explicitly as an argument.
A developer working on a simple web service integration is asked to add appropriate logging to allow future troubleshooting. According to logging best practices, which code should the developer write to log when an operation succeeds, but has an unexpected outcome that may produce side effects?
A. Logger.info(‘Unexpected service response’)
B. Logger.debug(‘Unexpected service response’)
C. Logger.error(‘Unexpected service response’)
D. Logger.warn(‘Unexpected service response’)
Explanation:
In Salesforce B2C Commerce, logging best practices recommend using the appropriate log level based on the severity and nature of the event:
When an operation succeeds but produces an unexpected outcome that might lead to side effects (e.g., unexpected data format, missing optional fields, or degraded performance), it’s not a failure — but it warrants attention.
The warn level is designed exactly for this: to flag potentially harmful situations that aren’t outright errors but could cause issues if ignored.
Why the other options don’t fit:
info is for general operational messages — not suitable for anomalies.
debug is for detailed internal diagnostics — useful during development, but not ideal for production alerts.
error is reserved for failures that prevent normal execution — which isn’t the case here.
Which three techniques improve client-side performance in production while following documented best practices? (Choose three.)
A. Use one style sheet for each ISML decorator template.
B. Place CSS outside of templates.
C. Compress CSS.
D. Use inline Javascript.
E. Combine several images into a single image.
Explanation:
To improve client-side performance in Salesforce B2C Commerce (and web development in general), you want to minimize HTTP requests, reduce file size, and optimize caching. Let’s break down each choice:
✅ B. Place CSS outside of templates
Why: External stylesheets can be cached by the browser, reducing load times on subsequent pages.
Best Practice: Avoid inline or per-template CSS. Load a single, minified stylesheet.
✅ C. Compress CSS
Why: Minification removes unnecessary spaces, comments, and line breaks from stylesheets.
Result: Smaller files → Faster load times
✅ E. Combine several images into a single image (aka CSS Sprites)
Why: Fewer image files = fewer HTTP requests.
How: Use background positioning in CSS to show only the part of the sprite needed for a specific UI element.
❌ A. Use one style sheet for each ISML decorator template
Why it's wrong: Multiple stylesheets increase the number of HTTP requests.
Best Practice: Combine all styles into one compressed stylesheet used across templates.
❌ D. Use inline JavaScript
Why it's wrong: Inline JS increases page size and cannot be cached.
Best Practice: Use external JavaScript files that can be cached and minified.
A Newsletter controller contains the following route:
Server.post(‘Subscribe’, function (req,res,next){
var newsletterForm = server.forms.getForm(‘newsletter’);var CustomObjectMgr =
require(‘dw/object/CustomObjectMgr’);
if(newsletterForm.valid){
try{
var CustomObject =
CustomObjectMgr.createCustomObejct(‘NewsletterSubscription’, newsletterform.email.value);
CustomObject.custom.firstName = newsletterForm.fname.value;
CustomObject.custom.lastName = newsletterForm.lname.value;-
} catch(e){
//Catch error here
}
}
next();
});
Assuming the Custom Object metadata exists, why does this route fail to render the newsletter template
when the subscription form is correctly submitted?
A. Custom Objects can only be created by Job scripts
B. The Subscribe route is missing the server.middleware.httpt middleware.
C. The CustomObjectMgr variable should be declare outside of the route
D. The Custom Object creation is not wrapped in a Transaction
Explanation:
In Salesforce B2C Commerce, when you're creating or modifying persistent objects — such as Custom Objects, Orders, or Customer Profiles — you must wrap the operation in a Transaction.wrap() block. This ensures atomicity, rollback on error, and complies with platform requirements.
Your current code attempts to create and modify a CustomObject, but it does not wrap the logic in a transaction, which is required for persistence operations.
✅ Corrected Code Snippet:
var Transaction = require('dw/system/Transaction');
if (newsletterForm.valid) {
try {
Transaction.wrap(function () {
var customObject = CustomObjectMgr.createCustomObject(
'NewsletterSubscription',
newsletterForm.email.value
);
customObject.custom.firstName = newsletterForm.fname.value;
customObject.custom.lastName = newsletterForm.lname.value;
});
} catch (e) {
// Handle error here
}
}
❌ Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
A. Custom Objects can only be created by Job scripts
➤ False. You can create them in storefront code, controllers, or jobs — as long as you use a transaction.
B. Missing server.middleware.httpt
➤ Not required for this route unless you are doing authentication or HTTPS checks. The middleware is optional, not the cause of failure.
C. The CustomObjectMgr variable should be declared outside the route
➤ Scope placement is fine. Declaring inside or outside the route doesn't cause runtime failure.
A Digital Developer selects “Show Orderable Products Only” in the Search > Search Preferences Business Manager module. Which business goal does this accomplish?
A. Exclude products from search results if Available to Sell (ATS) = 0.
B. Exclude back-ordered products from showing on the website.
C. Block displaying the product detail page if Available to Sell (ATS) = 0
D. Exclude pre-order products from search results.
Explanation:
In Salesforce B2C Commerce (SFCC), the option “Show Orderable Products Only” found in:
Business Manager → Merchant Tools → Search → Search Preferences
...controls whether search results will exclude products that cannot currently be ordered, based on inventory (ATS) and orderability status.
Specifically:
If ATS (Available To Sell) = 0, and
The product is not orderable due to inventory rules,
Then the product will be excluded from search results.
💡 This helps prevent customers from seeing out-of-stock products in search results, improving the buying experience and reducing frustration.
✅ This supports the business goal of:
Filtering out products from search results that cannot be purchased right now.
❌ Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
B. Exclude back-ordered products from showing on the website
➤ Not necessarily. Back-orderable products can still appear if they are orderable by configuration.
C. Block displaying the product detail page if ATS = 0
➤ This setting affects search results, not whether a product detail page (PDP) can be accessed.
D. Exclude pre-order products from search results
➤ Pre-order products may still be shown if configured as orderable. This setting doesn’t explicitly exclude them.
Page 1 out of 21 Pages |
Group | Pass Rate | Key Advantages |
---|---|---|
Used Practice Tests
|
90-95% |
• Familiarity with exam format • Identified knowledge gaps • Time management practice |
No Practice Tests
|
50-60% |
• Relies solely on theoretical study • Unprepared for question styles • Higher anxiety |