PDII Practice Test Questions

Total 193 Questions


Last Updated On : 2-Jun-2025



Preparing with PDII practice test is essential to ensure success on the exam. This Salesforce SP25 test allows you to familiarize yourself with the PDII exam questions format and identify your strengths and weaknesses. By practicing thoroughly, you can maximize your chances of passing the Salesforce certification spring 2025 release exam on your first attempt.

Surveys from different platforms and user-reported pass rates suggest PDII practice exam users are ~30-40% more likely to pass.

A company has an Apex process that makes multiple extensive database operations and web service callouts. The database processes and web services can take a long time to run and must be run sequentially.

How should the developer write this Apex code without running into governor limits and system limitations?



A. Use Queueable Apex to chain the jobs to run sequentially.


B. Use Apex Scheduler to schedule each process.


C. Use multiple 3zutuze methods for each process and callout.


D. Use Limits class to stop entire process once governor limits are reached.





A.
  Use Queueable Apex to chain the jobs to run sequentially.

Explanation:

The best approach to handle long-running Apex processes with sequential database operations and web service callouts is to use Queueable Apex. This method allows you to break down complex tasks into smaller, manageable jobs that execute one after another, ensuring each step runs in its own transaction with fresh governor limits. Unlike @future methods, Queueable Apex supports both DML operations and callouts, making it ideal for workflows that require interacting with databases and external APIs. Additionally, Queueable jobs can chain themselves, meaning each job can enqueue the next step upon completion, maintaining the required sequential order. This design prevents governor limit issues like CPU timeouts or excessive DML operations, as each job operates independently. Alternatives like the Apex Scheduler lack the ability to chain jobs tightly, while @future methods cannot guarantee order or handle callouts and DML in the same context. The Limits class merely monitors limits reactively but doesn’t solve the root problem. By leveraging Queueable Apex, developers ensure scalability, error isolation, and efficient resource usage, making it the only robust solution for this scenario.

Universal Containers stores user preferences in a hierarchy custom setting, user Prefs_c, with a checkbox field, show _help co. Company-level defaults are stored at the organizational level, but may be overridden at the user level. If a user has not overridden preferences, then the defaults should be used.
How should the show_Help_ c preference be retrieved for the current user?



A. Boolean show = User_Prefa_ c.getValuea().Show_Help_ co;


B. Boolean show = User Prefs c.getValues(UserInfo.getUserid{)).Show_Help c;


C. Boolean show = User_Prefs_c.getlnstance(].Show Help c;


D. Boolean show = User Prefs_c.show Melp_c;





C.
  Boolean show = User_Prefs_c.getlnstance(].Show Help c;

Explanation:

To retrieve the Show_Help__c preference for the current user while respecting hierarchy custom setting overrides, you must use the getInstance() method. Here’s why:

Hierarchy Behavior:

User_Prefs__c.getInstance() automatically checks for:
User-level overrides (if set).
Falls back to org-wide defaults if no user override exists.
This matches the requirement to "use defaults if the user hasn’t overridden preferences."

Correct Syntax:

The proper way to access the field is:

User_Prefs__c.getInstance().Show_Help__c;

getInstance() returns the most specific setting for the current user.

Why Other Options Fail:

A: getValuea() and Show_Help_co are invalid (typos).
B: getValues(UserId) forces a lookup for a specific user, ignoring the hierarchy’s fallback logic.
D: Direct field access (User_Prefs__c.Show_Help__c) is invalid—you must call getInstance() first.

A developer has a test class that creates test data before making a mock callout but now receives a 'You have uncommitted work pending. Please commit or rollback before calling out’ error.
Which step should be taken to resolve the error?



A. Ensure both the Insertion and mock callout occur after the I==L. stoptest_().


B. Ensure the records are Inserted before the Tezt.startTest() statement and the mock callout occurs within a method annotated with @testSetup.


C. Ensure both the insertion and mock callout occur after the Test.startTest().


D. Ensure the records are inserted before the Test.startTess() statement and the mock callout occurs after the Test. Startest().





D.
  Ensure the records are inserted before the Test.startTess() statement and the mock callout occurs after the Test. Startest().

Explanation:

The error:

“You have uncommitted work pending. Please commit or rollback before calling out.”

...occurs when DML (insert/update/delete) happens in the same transaction before a callout. Salesforce does not allow callouts and DML to be mixed unless they are properly sequenced.

Correct Practice:

Do all DML (record creation) before Test.startTest().
Perform mock callouts (e.g., via HttpCalloutMock) after Test.startTest().
Test.startTest() marks the boundary where governor limits are reset and is also the proper place to begin callouts in test methods.

Example:

@isTest
static void testCalloutLogic() {
// Create test data BEFORE callout
Account a = new Account(Name = 'Test Account');
insert a;

// Start test context and limits
Test.startTest();

// Register mock and invoke method that performs callout
Test.setMock(HttpCalloutMock.class, new MyMockCallout());
MyCalloutClass.performCallout(a.Id);

Test.stopTest();
}

A developer is trying to decide between creating a Visualforce component or a Lightning component for a custom screen.

Which functionality consideration impacts the final decision?



A. Does the screen need to be accessible from the Lightning Experience UI?


B. Does the screen need to be rendered as a PDF without using a thirdparty application?


C. Will the screen make use of a JavaScript framework?


D. Will the screen be accessed via a mobile app?





B.
  Does the screen need to be rendered as a PDF without using a thirdparty application?

Explanation:

One of the most critical functional differences between Visualforce components and Lightning components (Aura or LWC) is their support for server-side rendering and PDF generation.

Why B is correct:

Visualforce pages can be rendered as PDFs natively using the attribute.
Lightning components (LWC/Aura) do not support rendering as PDF directly — you'd need to use a third-party service or workaround.
So if your screen needs server-side PDF generation without third-party tools, Visualforce is required.

Instead of waiting to send emails to support personnel directly from the finish method of a batch Apex process, Universal Containers wants to notify an external system in the event that an unhandled exception occurs.

What is the appropriate publish/subscribe logic to meet this requirement?



A. Publish the error event using the Eventbus. publish () method.


B. No publishing is necessary. Have the external system subscribe to the BatchapexErrorEvent.


C. Publish the error event using the addError method.


D. Publish the error event with a Flow.





B.
  No publishing is necessary. Have the external system subscribe to the BatchapexErrorEvent.

Explanation:

Salesforce provides a built-in BatchApexErrorEvent platform event that automatically fires when an unhandled exception occurs in a batch Apex job. This event contains valuable information such as the exception type, message, stack trace, and affected records. Since this event is published automatically, no additional publishing logic is required. Instead, the external system can subscribe to the BatchApexErrorEvent and listen for error notifications in real time.

This approach ensures that errors are captured efficiently without requiring manual intervention or additional Apex logic. The external system can process the event and take appropriate action, such as logging the error or triggering an automated response.

Universal Containers ne=ds to integrate with several external systems. The process Is Initiated when a record Is created in Salesforce, The remote systems do not require Salesforce to wait for a response before continuing. What is the recommended best solution to accomplish this?



A. PushTopic event


B. Qutbound message


C. Trigger with HTTP callout


D. Platform event





D.
  Platform event

Explanation:

Since the external systems do not require Salesforce to wait for a response before continuing, the best approach is to use Platform Events. Platform Events provide an efficient publish-subscribe model, allowing Salesforce to notify external systems asynchronously when a record is created. This ensures that the integration process does not block Salesforce transactions and avoids governor limits associated with synchronous callouts.

Using Platform Events:

Decouples Salesforce from external systems, allowing them to process events independently.
Ensures scalability, as multiple external systems can subscribe to the same event.
Avoids callout limitations, since the event is published without requiring an immediate response.

Other options:

PushTopic event is used for streaming real-time updates but is not ideal for triggering external integrations.
Outbound messages are limited to workflow rules and do not provide the flexibility of Platform Events.
Trigger with HTTP callout would require synchronous execution, which is not recommended due to governor limits.

A corporation has many different Salesforce orgs, with some different objects and some common objects, and wants to build a single Java application that can create, retrieve, and update common object records in all of the different orgs.
Which method of integration should the application use?



A. SOAP API with the Partner WSDL


B. Apex REST Web Service


C. SOAP API with the Enterprise WSDL


D. Metadata APT





A.
  SOAP API with the Partner WSDL

Explanation:

The corporation wants to build a single Java application that can create, retrieve, and update common object records across many different Salesforce orgs, some of which have different schemas.

Why Partner WSDL is the best choice:

The Partner WSDL is loosely typed and schema-flexible.
It allows the Java application to work with sObject types dynamically without needing to regenerate the WSDL for each Salesforce org.
Ideal for multi-org integration, where object definitions may differ.
Enables the app to read metadata at runtime and perform CRUD operations on standard/custom objects.

A developer writes a Lightning web component that displays a dropdown list of all custom objects in the org from which a user will select. An Apex method prepares and returns data to the component.
What should the developer do to determine which objects to include in the response?



A. Check the isCustom() value on the sObject describe result,


B. Import the list of all custom objects from @salesforce/schema.


C. Check the getobiectType [) value for ‘Custom’ or "Standard’ on the sObject describe result.


D. Use the getcustomobjects() method from the Schema class.





A.
  Check the isCustom() value on the sObject describe result,

Explanation:

To display a dropdown list of all custom objects in a Lightning Web Component, the Apex method must:

Use the Schema class to get all SObject types.
Check each object’s describe result to determine if it is a custom object.
Return the list of custom objects to the LWC.

Why isCustom() is correct:

The isCustom() method of the DescribeSObjectResult class returns true if the object is custom.
You can loop through all SObjects using Schema.getGlobalDescribe() and filter for custom objects using describeResult.isCustom().

A developer is asked to develop a new AppFxchange application. A feature of the program creates Survey records when a Case reaches a certain stage and is of a certain Record Type. This feature needs to be configurable, as different Salesforce instances require Surveys at different times. Additionally, the out-of-the-box AppExchange app needs to come with a set of best practice settings that apply to most customers.

What should the developer use to store and package the custom configuration settings for the app?



A. Custom objects


B. Custom settings


C. Custom metadata


D. Custom labels





C.
  Custom metadata

Explanation:

Custom metadata is the best choice for storing and packaging configuration settings in an AppExchange application. It allows developers to define metadata records that can be deployed with the managed package, ensuring that best practice settings are included by default while still allowing customers to modify them as needed.

Key advantages of using custom metadata:

Deployable with the AppExchange package – Unlike custom settings, custom metadata records can be included in the package, ensuring that default configurations are available upon installation.
Configurable per org – Customers can modify the metadata records to suit their specific needs without requiring code changes.
Efficient retrieval – Custom metadata is cached and does not count against SOQL query limits, making it ideal for frequently accessed configuration data.

Other options:

Custom objects – Not ideal for configuration settings because they require manual data entry and cannot be packaged with default values.
Custom settings – While useful for storing org-specific configurations, they cannot be packaged with predefined records in a managed package.
Custom labels – Used for storing translatable text, not for configuration logic.

There are user complaints about slow render times of a custom data table within a Visualforce page that loads thousands of Account records at once.
What can a developer do to help alleviate such issues?



A. Use JavaScript remoting to query the accounts.


B. Use the transient keyword in the Apex code when querying the Account records.


C. Upload a third-party data table library as a static resource.


D. Use the standard Account List controller and implement pagination.





D.
  Use the standard Account List controller and implement pagination.

Explanation:

Rendering thousands of records at once in a Visualforce page can significantly impact performance, leading to slow load times and potential view state issues. The best approach to mitigate this is to implement pagination using the standard Account List controller or a custom pagination mechanism. This ensures that only a subset of records is displayed at any given time, reducing the processing load and improving responsiveness.

Other options:

A. JavaScript remoting can help reduce server-side processing but does not directly address the issue of excessive data rendering.
B. The transient keyword is useful for reducing view state size but does not solve the problem of loading too many records at once.
C. A third-party data table library may improve UI rendering but does not optimize the underlying data retrieval process.

Page 5 out of 20 Pages
PDII Practice Test Home Previous